Użytkownik "Heming" <heming@wytnij_to.gazeta.pl> napisał w wiadomości
news:dqqh49$8lq$1@inews.gazeta.pl...
>
> A ile jest w Polsce takich osób? 10-15?

Nawet w necie są "przepisy" na oszukanie :)

Cytat ze strony http://antipolygraph.org/faq.shtml#q5
"Anyone can beat a polygraph test. It is a common misperception that one
must be a sociopathic liar or somehow believe one's own lies to beat the
polygraph. The truth is that one need merely understand the trickery on
which the "test" depends. In particular, one must understand the difference
between relevant, irrelevant, and so-called "control" questions (which
provide no control whatsoever in the scientific sense of the word). The key
to beating a polygraph "test" is 1) to make no damaging admissions and 2) to
subtly augment one's physiological responses to the "control" questions. You
will find a full explanation of exactly how to employ these techniques in
Chapter 4 of The Lie Behind the Lie Detector.
Polygraphers frequently claim that any experienced polygrapher can readily
spot polygraph countermeasures (attempts to beat the polygraph). However,
such claims are entirely unsupported by peer-reviewed scientific research.
On the contrary, peer-reviewed research indicates that polygraphers are not
capable of detecting countermeasures attempts at better than chance levels."



Plik w pdf http://antipolygraph.org/lie-behind-the-lie-detector
.pdf



--
Jackie
http://www.akwaria.pl/krewetki
http://www.krewetki.tvkg.net