Dostalem dzis pismo ze Strasburga. Odmawiaja mi w ramach wgladu do akt
ujawnienia decyzji i skladu sedziowskiego. Nie ma sprawiedliwosci na
swiecie. Bierzcie sprawy w swoje rece.

Dear Sir,

I acknowledge receipt of your letter of 27 February 2006 in which you
request a copy of the decision of the panel of the Grand Chamber not to
accept your request for a rehearing of the above case.

In reply, I would inform you that under Rule 73 § 2 of the Rules of Court
the panel is not required to give reasons for refusing a request for a case
to be referred to the Grand Chamber and that the letter informing you that
the case will not be reheard can be considered as the panel's decision.

Yours faithfully,
----------------------------
Juz zrozumialem, wedlug wytycznych do Konwencji Przepis 73 ustep 2, odmowa
przyjecia wniosku o rozpatrzenie sprawy przed Wysoka Izba nie musi byc
uzasadniona. Czyli faktycznie kapturowy sad. To gorzej niz w sadach
krajowych, tam przynajmniej nie ukrywaja nazwisk sedziow, ktorzy decyzje
wydali. A ja nie moge w ramach prawa wgladu do akt nawet otrzymac
nieuzasadnionej decyzji? Skad opinia publiczna ma wiedziec, ze takowa
decyzja wogole istnieje? Do Pana Boga sie odwolac?

Rule 73

2. A panel of five judges of the Grand Chamber constituted in accordance
with Rule 24 § 5 shall examine the request solely on the basis of the
existing case file. It shall accept the request only if it considers that
the case does raise such a question or issue. Reasons need not be given for
a refusal of the request.

3. If the panel accepts the request, the Grand Chamber shall decide the case
by means of a judgment.
---------------------------
No prosze, jak daleko macki Niemcow siegaja. W piecioosobowej Komisji
Wysokiej Izby, zgodnie z wytycznymi, przepis 24 ustep 5 do Konwencji,
zasiada prezydent Trybunalu, prezydenci poszczegolnych Izb nizszych z
wylaczeniem prezydenta Izby, ktora rozpatrywala skarge, lub inni mianowani
sedziowie. Jestem ciekaw jakiej narodowosci sa ci kapturowi sedziowie. Czy
tego tez nie bede w stanie sie dowiedziec? Zobaczymy jak Europa daleko
odbiega od prawa rzymskiego?

Rule 24

5. (a) The panel of five judges of the Grand Chamber called upon to consider
requests submitted under Article 43 of the Convention shall be composed of

- the President of the Court;

- the Presidents or, if they are prevented from sitting, the Vice-Presidents
of the Sections other than the Section from which was constituted the
Chamber that dealt with the case whose referral to the Grand Chamber is
being sought;

- a further judge designated in rotation from among the judges other than
those who dealt with the case in the Chamber.

(b) No judge elected in respect of, or who is a national of, a Contracting
Party concerned may be a member of the Panel.

(c) Any member of the panel unable to sit shall be replaced by another judge
who did not deal with the case in the Chamber, who shall be designated in
rotation.

boukun