On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 11:48:51 +0200, "szerszen" <w...@s...pl>
wrote:


>nie moga miec ujemnego bilansu bo to by oznaczalo ze przyczyniaja sie do
>smierci, moga miec co najwyzej zerowy, a w to nie wierze

Jest ujemny!!!! Mamy 1 - na poziomie uniwersyteckim - badanie skutkow
progow.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Na kazdego 1 pieszego uratowanego przez
zwolnienie ruchu przez progi zwalniajace, 37 ludzi
umrze przez opozniony czas reakcji sluzb medycznych.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<


Oczywiscie przy tak porazajacym argumencie pisanie
o zanieczyszczeniu powietrza(alerting him to the increase
in pollution caused by speed humps), halasie, drganiach i
uszkodzeniu samochodu (Humps damage cars - especially older cars)
pomine.


"The Decatur Daily News" WEDNESDAY, APRIL 7, 2004
"Council slows speed humps"
"University of Texas study suggests that for every pedestrian killed
by a speeder, 37 people may die as a result of the delayed response
times caused to police, fire and ambulance services"

"Speed trapped" 8/16/00
By Jeffrey C. Billman
"Using a detailed formula developed by Boulder, Colo., scientist Ray
Bowman, Bunte determined that in Austin, at least 37 people would die
because of slower emergency-response time for every one life saved by
slower traffic. Since Bunte took into account only deaths from sudden
cardiac arrest -- and not from delayed fire response or any other
condition -- that number could be higher."

i teraz cytat z oryginalu

Cytat z PDF'a z oryginalnym raportem, calosc 276 stron:
"A policy analysis was conducted specifically for the conflict that
had
arisen in Austin, Texas. Based on quantitative processes, this
analysis showed
that Austin would lose an additional 37 lives per year with patients
of sudden
cardiac arrest if the Fire and EMS Departments experienced a 30 second
delay
in response times due to traffic calming. The analyses also concluded
that at
best, only one pedestrian life could be saved each year from traffic
calming as
pedestrian fatalities rarely occurred within residential
neighborhoods. A
risk/benefit analyses also demonstrated that traffic-calming devices
have more
of a negative impact than a positive impact to the community."