eGospodarka.pl
eGospodarka.pl poleca

eGospodarka.plPrawoGrupypl.soc.prawoKazus z prawa angielskiegoKazus z prawa angielskiego
  • Path: news-archive.icm.edu.pl!news.rmf.pl!news.ipartners.pl!newsfeed.gazeta.pl!newsfe
    ed.tpinternet.pl!news2.icm.edu.pl!news.pw.edu.pl!not-for-mail
    From: "jarek" <j...@e...pw.edu.pl>
    Newsgroups: pl.soc.prawo
    Subject: Kazus z prawa angielskiego
    Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 21:59:34 +0100
    Organization: Warsaw University of Technology
    Lines: 64
    Message-ID: <avi3hc$9h3$1@julia.coi.pw.edu.pl>
    NNTP-Posting-Host: 10.1.3.72
    X-Trace: julia.coi.pw.edu.pl 1042059628 9763 10.1.3.72 (8 Jan 2003 21:00:28 GMT)
    X-Complaints-To: u...@p...edu.pl
    NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 21:00:28 +0000 (UTC)
    X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
    X-Priority: 3
    X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    Xref: news-archive.icm.edu.pl pl.soc.prawo:121943
    [ ukryj nagłówki ]

    Czy ktoś może mi pomóc rozwiązać następujący kazus:
    (chodzi o kilka zdań, jakieś wskazówki które casy wykorzystać)

    Craig wishes to arrange a Xmas party for his firm 'Naivety and Inefficiency'
    on the 21st December and contacts Roguish Restaurants to arrange to book
    them as a venue for the evening. His initial contact is with Andrew who he
    meets whilst dining at the restaurant on the 10th October 2002. Craig is
    told a provisional booking has been made and is given a list of possible
    party options with prices for each option. They agree a minimum price for
    the hire of the restaurant of ?1,000 Andrew confirms there is no need to
    contact him until a week before to confirm the numbers and also which of the
    party options would be appropriate and gives him his e-mail address.



    On the 10th November Craig e-mails Andrew indicating that he wishes to
    change the date of the party to the 14th December. He receives no response
    to this e-mail nor any indication that the e-mail has not been delivered. In
    the following week he writes a further e-mail stating 'in relation to party
    in December we would like to choose option B on the menu and some 100 people
    are expected. Please let me know about payment of any deposits required.'
    Andrew acknowledges this e-mail on the 11th November and confirms 'deposit
    of 10% required 24 hours before the event.'



    On the 10th December Craig calls in Roguish Restaurants to pay the required
    deposit. He is told that he has no reservation for the 14th but they have a
    booking for the 21st as agreed. When Craig protests and refers to his
    e-mail, Andrew replies that he had no e-mail from him about the change of
    date. Craig is furious, as he cannot change the date of the party to 21st as
    the board of the company will be abroad on that date. Andrew says it's
    impossible to change the booking now to the 14th December as they are
    already fully booked on that date.



    Craig finds it very difficult at this late date to find an alternative
    venue, the only place available being 'Shoddy and Nasty' a new restaurant
    which is free that weekend. He therefore books there and pays them a deposit
    of 10% in the sum of ?150. They agree to prepare some food and also a
    certain amount of free drink for the party.

    When the guests arrive on the 14th they wait for one hour for the food to
    arrive as there are insufficient waiters employed. In addition the food is
    cold and guests comment on the unusual taste of the meal. The waiter replies
    that it is a speciality of the house and very popular.



    Craig pays the balance required of ?1,350 on arrival at the restaurant

    The next day 50 of the guests are taken to hospital seriously ill with food
    poisoning. Naivety and Inefficiency was involved in a large contract which
    they were completing in the following week and are now unable to deal with
    everything on time due to the absence of so many staff. They are obliged to
    pay a penalty of 20% on the contract price in the sum of ?10,000



    Advise Craig and Naivety and Inefficiency.



Podziel się

Poleć ten post znajomemu poleć

Wydrukuj ten post drukuj

Najnowsze wątki z tej grupy


Najnowsze wątki

Szukaj w grupach

Eksperci egospodarka.pl

1 1 1